COMPARISON

CanaryVaults vs Thinkst Canary

Thinkst invented the modern commercial canary and remains the reference for network and host deception. CanaryVaults starts where the network ends: the AI layer — documents feeding RAG pipelines, prompts hitting your models, and autonomous agents taking actions. Many teams run both.

Start free Read the docs

CAPABILITY BY CAPABILITY

What each platform is built for.

CapabilityCanaryVaultsThinkst Canary

Network / host decoysNot offered. No hardware or VM appliances.Core strength — appliances and VMs that impersonate servers, network devices, and workstations.

Email decoy identitiesGenerated decoy contacts planted per file, with full header and sender-infrastructure capture on contact.Canarytokens cover related tripwire cases such as documents and URLs that phone home.

RAG / document trap factsFictional facts woven into documents; detection survives paraphrase and re-embedding, with per-copy attribution.Not a product focus; token-based document tripwires fire on open rather than on model ingestion.

Prompt-injection firewallThree-layer inline proxy (rules, semantic analyzer, sanitizer) adopted by changing one base URL.Not offered — Thinkst focuses on detection via decoys, not LLM input filtering.

AI honeypot assistantsDecoy chat endpoints with synthetic data, per-prompt intent classification, and visitor fingerprinting.Decoys target network services and credentials rather than conversational AI endpoints.

Agent audit trailSHA-256 hash-chained action log with public re-verification and PDF export.Not offered; alerting is the product surface, not agent action logging.

AlertingEmail and Telegram alerts with evidence attached; alert rules by intent class on honeypots.Mature multi-channel alerting with a strong reputation for low false positives.

Free tierYes — usable limits on every surface except CanaryAudit, no credit card.Canarytokens.org is free; the Canary platform is a paid product (see their site for terms).

Capability summaries reflect each vendor's public documentation at the time of writing. We do not list competitor pricing — check their site. If a row is out of date, tell us and we will fix it.

THE HONEST VERSION

Different problems, different tools.

Thinkst earned its reputation.

Thinkst Canary is widely respected for doing one thing extremely well: decoy devices that almost never false-positive. If your threat model is lateral movement inside a corporate network, they are the obvious first call.

We cover a different attack surface.

CanaryVaults assumes the interesting attacks now arrive through documents, prompts, and autonomous agents. Nothing we ship watches your switches; everything we ship watches your AI surface.

These tools stack.

Network canaries and AI-layer canaries answer different questions and do not conflict. Running Thinkst for infrastructure and CanaryVaults for the AI layer is a coherent setup, not a compromise.

CHOOSE THINKST CANARY IF

→Your priority is detecting lateral movement across an internal network.→You want physical or VM appliances that impersonate infrastructure.→You need a long enterprise track record for procurement.

CHOOSE CANARYVAULTS IF

✓You ship LLM features and need to know if documents leak into other models.✓You want a prompt-injection firewall in front of production models.✓You run autonomous agents and need a tamper-evident action log.✓You want to start free today without a procurement cycle.

GO DEEPER

Field notes from the team.

A believable decoy teaches you more than a blocked request

Why the quality of the trap determines the quality of the signal.

Proof beats suspicion when private documents leak through AI

How planted trap facts turn a hard question into a binary signal.

One platform, five product surfaces, fewer blind spots

How the CanaryVaults surfaces share one evidence log.

Put canaries on your AI layer today.

Free tier, no credit card. Five minutes to your first alert.